Have you seen this announcement? http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RubyInside/~3/342732232/redcloth-4-released-962.html Apart from dropping of Markdown support (does radiant use it?), it could be interesting to update it.
on 24.07.2008 12:06
on 24.07.2008 15:44
How would people feel about switching to a gem dependency on the latest RedCloth (instead of packaging it)? Sean
on 24.07.2008 17:06
I'm fine with it. Looks like a good improvement too. Now all we need is a better Markdown parser. -Chris
on 24.07.2008 17:17
Someone was working on a branch that uses rdiscount, an improved Markdown parser. Sean
on 24.07.2008 17:24
It's a bit of a detour from Radiant being geared toward shared hosting. John Muhl is working on a branch than uses RDiscount (which is a better Markdown parser). http://github.com/johnmuhl/radiant/tree/markdown On Jul 24, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Chris Parrish wrote: >> Sean >> >> Ollivier Robert wrote: >>> Have you seen this announcement? >>> >>> http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RubyInside/~3/342732232/redcloth-4- >>> released-962.html >>> >>> Apart from dropping of Markdown support (does radiant use it?), it >>> could be interesting to update it. Jim Gay http://www.saturnflyer.com
on 24.07.2008 17:32
I understood discoount to be *nix only (no Windows). I'll have to look into it further. -Chris
on 24.07.2008 17:35
That was my main concern... I'd like to continue packaging the library with Radiant, but it is no longer pure-Ruby and must be compiled. That said, RubyGems has greatly improved since we started down this road. Sean
on 24.07.2008 19:54
On 2008/07/24, at 07:44, Sean Cribbs wrote: > How would people feel about switching to a gem dependency on the > latest RedCloth (instead of packaging it)? I think it's going to have to happen at some point unless Radiant wants to keep using the same old text parsing libraries from 2004/2005. Waiting for the pure ruby libraries catch back up is the other (wishful) option. On 2008/07/24, at 09:31, Chris Parrish wrote: > I understood discoount to be *nix only (no Windows). I'll have to > look into it further. That's right. Although there isn't anything really stopping it from being compiled for windows with mingw just like they did RedCloth 4; except of course finding people who use windows to do the work :) There is also PEG markdown (rpeg-markdown in ruby land) but right now it is completely unusable on big (huge?) spans of text and I'm not sure it's any easier to get running in windows. Personally, I'd rather have a PEG based Markdown than a Discount based one. As far as getting a new Markdown parser into core I'd say don't even bother yet. As has been stated Discount doesn't (yet) run on windows, and PEG Markdown is crashy (and probably doesn't run on windows either). I would definitely like to see Radiant upgrade to RedCloth 4 sometime soon. If no one jumps up to take it on in the next week, I'll try to get it running then. p.s. I did put together a standalone Markdown filter that uses rdiscount, so if you can install gems and don't run windows you can use that until something better is in the core. I use it on live sites with no problems (some were even started with the standard Markdown filter and upgraded without issue). http://github.com/johnmuhl/radiant-markdown-extension
on 24.07.2008 21:19
I saw somewhere that Luis Lavena was researching porting rDiscount to Windows but also that it didn't look good (discount depends on some *nix only libraries, I think) Hopefully I'm wrong, though. Either way, I didn't mean to hijack a thread. New Redcloth for all! -Chris
on 26.07.2008 11:35
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Chris Parrish <chris.parrish-forummail@swankinnovations.com> wrote: > I saw somewhere that Luis Lavena was researching porting rDiscount to > Windows but also that it didn't look good (discount depends on some *nix > only libraries, I think) > > Hopefully I'm wrong, though. > > Either way, I didn't mean to hijack a thread. New Redcloth for all! > Thread-hijacking... :-) rDiscount uses some neat posic tricks that allow them use callbacks from file operations in a in-memory file (mapped file). This function is name funopen and fopencookie. There is no way to recreate that in Windows, tried and failed (maybe because my C-fu is not good enough). There are better ways that the same can be accomplished but we should be careful not to exploit with huge memory buffers. Maybe someone can write a ragel for markdown and we all enjoy a BlueCloth like the new RedCloth? ;-) -- Luis Lavena AREA 17 - Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so. Douglas Adams
on 27.07.2008 04:16
Jim Gay wrote: > It's a bit of a detour from Radiant being geared toward shared hosting. > > John Muhl is working on a branch than uses RDiscount (which is a > better Markdown parser). > http://github.com/johnmuhl/radiant/tree/markdown Simply gem unpack. Easy peasy. Also, Webfaction is one of the best in terms of shared hosting, rails and radiantcms.
on 30.07.2008 19:23
How do I try the new RedCloth 4 with radiant? I do remember seeing instructions somewhere. Jasper
on 25.08.2008 22:24
I just sent a pull request to make RedCloth a gem dependency, so hopefully edge will have that ability soon. In the meantime, I used some code like this in an extension: # Get the latest version of RedCloth Object.send :remove_const, :RedCloth if Object.const_defined?(:RedCloth) $:.delete File.join(RADIANT_ROOT, 'vendor', 'redcloth', 'lib') gem 'RedCloth', '>= 4.0.3' require 'RedCloth' Hope it works for you. Jason
on 25.08.2008 23:01
Make that: # Get the latest version of RedCloth Object.send :remove_const, :RedCloth if Object.const_defined? (:RedCloth) && RedCloth::VERSION.is_a?(String) $:.delete File.join(RADIANT_ROOT, 'vendor', 'redcloth', 'lib') gem 'RedCloth', '>= 4.0.3' require 'RedCloth'
on 26.08.2008 22:00
Jasper, I've just put out a redcloth4 Radiant extension: http://ext.radiantcms.org/extensions/28-redcloth4 Give that a try. Jasper Kooij wrote: > How do I try the new RedCloth 4 with radiant? I do remember seeing > instructions somewhere. > > Jasper
on 27.09.2008 06:34
Hi Jason,
I've tried to load it using the extension way but that failed. Then I
did the git way and that worked fine :
[~/radiant]# script/extension redcloth4
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/radiant-0.6.9/vendor/rails/activeresource/lib/../../activesupport/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:263:in
`load_missing_constant': uninitialized constant
Radiant::Extension::Script::Redcloth4 (NameError)
from
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/radiant-0.6.9/vendor/rails/activeresource/lib/../../activesupport/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:453:in
`const_missing'
from
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/radiant-0.6.9/lib/radiant/extension/script.rb:193:in
`const_get'
from
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/radiant-0.6.9/lib/radiant/extension/script.rb:193:in
`execute'
from script/extension:5
[~/radiant]# cd ~/radiant
[~/radiant]# git clone
git://github.com/jgarber/radiant-redcloth4-extension.git
vendor/extensions/redcloth4
Initialized empty Git repository in
/home/xxxx/radiant/vendor/extensions/redcloth4/.git/
remote: Counting objects: 16, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (16/16), done.
remote: Total 16 (delta 4), reused 0 (delta 0)
Receiving objects: 100% (16/16), 11.14 KiB, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (4/4), done.
on 03.10.2008 17:00
Jasper Kooij wrote: > Hi Jason, > > I've tried to load it using the extension way but that failed. > > [~/radiant]# script/extension redcloth4 You have to specify an action to do with the extension, like install: # script/extension install redcloth4 That works perfectly. You'd get the same error if you tried script/extension page_attachments Hope the extension is working out well for you! Jason
on 03.10.2008 17:05
Jason Garber wrote: > Jasper Kooij wrote: >> Hi Jason, >> >> I've tried to load it using the extension way but that failed. >> >> [~/radiant]# script/extension redcloth4 > > You have to specify an action to do with the extension, like install: > > # script/extension install redcloth4 > > That works perfectly. You'd get the same error if you tried > script/extension page_attachments > > Hope the extension is working out well for you! > > Jason Hi Jason, Thanks for pointing that out that i've missed the obvious! I am using it, trying to get the hang of redcloth. I relly don't want to install a wysiwyg unless i have to. Thanks Jasper