Ruby Forum Radiant CMS > 0.6.9 sass_filter Extension

Posted by Chuck Barr (cvk_b)
on 29.08.2008 05:50
In order to use the sass_filter extension with 0.6.9 master I had to add
this file:
.../vendor/plugins/haml/lib/haml/util.rb

(http://dev.radiantcms.org/browser/trunk/extensions/vendor/plugins/haml/lib/haml/util.rb?rev=705)

I got the extension from here:
http://github.com/radiant/radiant-sass-filter-extension/tree/master

I'm not sure the best practice way to add this directly or I'd've done
it myself from a fork.

fyi

cvk_b
Posted by Sean Cribbs (seancribbs)
on 29.08.2008 14:50
(Received via mailing list)
Haml has been included in Radiant since 0.6.7.  We need to remove it
from the sass_filter extension.

Sean
Posted by Chuck Barr (cvk_b)
on 29.08.2008 21:35
Sean Cribbs wrote:
> Haml has been included in Radiant since 0.6.7.  We need to remove it
> from the sass_filter extension.
> 
> Sean

I realize there's potential confusion for the new user but sass_filter 
should come stock like textile or markdown. It may generate interest in 
sass.





Posted by Sean Cribbs (seancribbs)
on 29.08.2008 21:40
(Received via mailing list)
Chuck,

I like that idea... a patch/pull-request would be appreciated!

Sean
Posted by Andrew Neil (Guest)
on 29.08.2008 22:33
(Received via mailing list)
On 29 Aug 2008, at 20:35, Chuck Barr wrote:

> Sean Cribbs wrote:
>> Haml has been included in Radiant since 0.6.7.  We need to remove it
>> from the sass_filter extension.
>>
>> Sean
>
> I realize there's potential confusion for the new user but sass_filter
> should come stock like textile or markdown.

+1

Drew
Posted by Chris Parrish (cparrish)
on 31.08.2008 22:37
(Received via mailing list)
I like SASS.  I like promoting SASS.  But giving SASS as an option to
every page might be confusing to a basic, non-technical user.

SASS is really geared at the designer.  Does the SASS filter take this
user role into account?

FWIW, I'm sort of inclined to want Textile and Markup not be "standard"
but rather a regular extension.  After all, some may prefer to leave
them out and instead use WMD, or even a WYSIWYG editor.  And there have
been some discussions of wanting to use different Markdown or Textile
parsers too.

Just my $0.02.

-Chris