Folks,
I find it really hard to follow conversations that use top posting (
Posting style - Wikipedia).
If you have a [Cucumber] topic, please respond with inline comments. And
use
plain text email - not html.
Thanks,
Aslak
On 07/05/2009, at 4:54 AM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
Folks,
I find it really hard to follow conversations that use top posting (Posting style - Wikipedia
).
If you have a [Cucumber] topic, please respond with inline comments.
And use plain text email - not html.
I find it quite hard to follow conversations that use bottom posting,
so I’ll try to do interleaved comments from now on. It’s almost
impossible to do interleave posting on the iphone, btw.
Thanks.
Julian.
Blog: http://random8.zenunit.com/
Learn: http://sensei.zenunit.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/random8r
rspec-users mailing list
removed_email_address@domain.invalid
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Ben M. removed_email_address@domain.invalid wrote:
Aslak
So let me get this right,
you agreed with Aslak that you shouldn’t top post.
by top posting???
–
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale
Rick DeNatale wrote:
lol… Yes. 
Sarcasm somethings doesn’t come across well over email
I suppose.
-Ben
How about both top and bottom posting?
Francis H.
On May 6, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Ben M. wrote:
lol… Yes.
Sarcasm somethings doesn’t come across well over
email I suppose.
How about both top and bottom posting?
Francis H.
Just so you know, your message isn’t just plain text. Here’s a portion
of the raw message:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style).
Folks,
I find it really hard to follow conversations that use top po=
sting (<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style">http://en.wik=
ipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style).
If you have a [Cucumber] topic, plea=
se respond with inline comments. And use plain text email - not html.
Thanks,
Aslak–001636c5b0eedf7860046942ecfc–
–===============0527642389==
-Steve
On May 6, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
Thanks,
AslakSo let me get this right,
you agreed with Aslak that you shouldn’t top post.
by top posting???
And Aslak’s post was multipart/mime!? Was that just for the irony? You
guys are funny…
Andrew V.
Nick: How about On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Francis H. <
On 7 mei 2009, at 19:12, Kero van Gelder wrote:
Not only that, he did it in so it was impossible for
me to see whether it was top or bottom. The sarcasm was clear
enough, tho+1 from me, too.
I’m adding a request: cut out the paragraphs of the email
that you are not responding to.
Same goes for signatures, if you’d ask me.
gr,
bartz
So let me get this right,
you agreed with Aslak that you shouldn’t top post.
by top posting???
lol… Yes.
I suppose.
Not only that, he did it in so it was impossible for
me to see whether it was top or bottom. The sarcasm was clear
enough, tho 
+1 from me, too.
I’m adding a request: cut out the paragraphs of the email
that you are not responding to. I’m encountering plenty of
emails that don’t fit on my screen (which is much bigger than
an iPhone) and turn out to contain not much more than
“yes”, “thanks” or "see lighthouse ".
Bye,
Kero.
How can I change the world if I can’t even change myself?
– Faithless, Salva Mea