Why is the camping handler using Mutex#synchronize to serve requests?
I was under the impression that camping was considered more thread
safe than Rails?
-Zach
Why is the camping handler using Mutex#synchronize to serve requests?
I was under the impression that camping was considered more thread
safe than Rails?
-Zach
A good question. Originally most people used Camping with ActiveRecord
in its default non-concurrent mode, so that’s probably why. It should
perhaps be removed.
Or is there some interaction problem with the Camping reloader?
Evan
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.
Sponsor our Newsletter | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs