-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am 09.05.2011 22:01, schrieb Alex F.:
the issues on the Ubuntu bugtracker. I was half-thinking of switching to
Fedora anyway before the next Ubuntu came out - maybe this will tip me
over.
I think I already mentioned it, but it was exaktly wxRuby that was the
final reason for me to switch from Ubuntu to Arch Linux. I really enjoy
the rolling release model now–no way back.
However, Ubuntu is the most-widespread Linux distribution out there.
It’s not wise to drop support for it I think, because it would
significantly state a contrast to the platform-indepentness wxRuby aims
to provide.
Martin, I have been quite successful at deploying both 32 bit and
64-bit
10.04 installations of wxRuby. I had to go back to the 2.0.0 gem for
64, but
it seems to work quite fine with our rather elaborate application.
Ubuntu Lucid 64bit worked without a problem for me, even though I had to
compile wxRuby 2.0.1 myself. It’s just that wxRuby doesn’t work on each
and every Ubuntu after Lucid.
And btw. my name is Marvin, note the v.
Hi Don, on which distributions and versions of those distributions
were you
deploying your apps on?
I can confirm wxRuby not working for Ubuntu Maverick 64bit, Ubuntu
Maverick 32bit, Ubuntu Natty 32bit (the last to being virtual machines)
and Arch Linux 64bit (completely updated last Friday)*. But I suppose it
doesn’t work for different reasons on each machine…
Here’s the bug that discussion references, in Debian:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613221
Thanks! It really looks like a bug in pixman then.
###########################
So, what can we do now? wxRuby’s obviously not at fault, it’s
a) pixman that is broken and
b) Debian/Ubuntu that ships broken wxWidgets packages
b) is marked as fixed for Oneiric, but I doubt wheather wxRuby will run
then, because of a) and a symbol lookup error I already described on
Launchpad (this would be c) then I think).
The pixman bug breaks wxRuby on nearly every recent Linux distribution,
and Debian/Ubuntu breaks it a second time due to their package
management, which is especially problementic because of their
popularity.
To conclude: I’m worried about wxRuby’s future, although it seems that
wxRuby can’t do much about the mentioned problems.
best
alex
Valete,
Marvin
- The distros I were using “normally”, i.e. not as virtual machines,
were like this:
Ubuntu Lucid 64bit → Ubuntu Maverick 64bit [broke wxRuby] → Arch Linux
64bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNyXOBAAoJELh1XLHFkqhajpYIAK0/ZBrho5fd9fGaEkGGQbal
+uwRxdavIldM38I8wolfIomPEZxTzupim+NPLigB1NHToUrSjhhCGkg482YuJR9u
HMncfRInw5eK/rXo1xHwF213sY3bZtxy9EOG+lJ/qLCm6qrke5tAGBKLzsY62QtG
v4KOXGNOyC+NEtdHFyPhancvwqrjfnyL/OjgUMku03saLq58vDZMiv1rAz++m69c
RO5h6sIZ+ZHp4tVIKSMKjLYoyQrVfuNK/A0RJMdpnLlsz+oAiP36sS65wKEL1wB4
+F62p7Ow/yjgItqAeG2HgKRcJyKwRT9tXSK8M83dsxWk9hyJVubILa2dWpvsD70=
=12Su
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----