Domo arigato
by
TheR
Domo arigato
by
TheR
This is great - nice work by the ruby team!
In updating one of my gems for 1.9 compatability, I came across this
behaviour (which I don’t believe I’ve seen noted in the other changes
lists), and just wanted to find out if it is expected:
$ irb
a = *[1]; p a
=> 1
$ irb1.9
a = *[1]; p a
=> [1]
Regards,
Charles
You can get binaries of PDCurses, GDBM, OpenSSL, readline and Zlib at
Porting Libraries to Win32.
http://jarp.does.notwork.org/win32/ is the link it gives for that, but
my
browsers won’t connect. Is anyone else having that problem?
-jayce
From: “Luis L.” [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 5:10 AM
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
To: “ruby-talk ML” [email protected]
Subject: Re: Win32 Binary errors
Hi,
Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner wrote:
Jayce M. wrote:
You can get binaries of PDCurses, GDBM, OpenSSL, readline and Zlib at
Porting Libraries to Win32.http://jarp.does.notwork.org/win32/ is the link it gives for that, but
my
browsers won’t connect. Is anyone else having that problem?I also cannot reach this. Trying to “ping” (61.197.191.146) leads to
lost packages.
The hard disk was crashed two days ago.
Wait patiently.
Jayce M. wrote:
You can get binaries of PDCurses, GDBM, OpenSSL, readline and Zlib at
Porting Libraries to Win32.http://jarp.does.notwork.org/win32/ is the link it gives for that, but
my
browsers won’t connect. Is anyone else having that problem?
I also cannot reach this. Trying to “ping” (61.197.191.146) leads to
lost packages.
Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner
hi list,
we are currently preparing Ruby 1.9.1-p0 and 1.8.7-p72 binary packages
for Mac OSX (Leopard, Tiger, Panther and below also supported). I’ll
keep you all posted when the final packages are ready.
Project page: http://rubyosx.com
regards,
matthias
In article
[email protected],
Gregory B. [email protected] wrote:
A huge thanks to all of ruby-core for this, and for your hard work on
release management, Yugui.
Kudos to the team!
Is there a possibility that Ruby 1.8.8 will go back to being similar
to 1.8.6 and remove the 1.9 compatibility shims?
This would make maintaining old 1.8 code much easier.
I second that.
2009/2/1 WATANABE Hirofumi [email protected]:
I also cannot reach this. Trying to “ping” (61.197.191.146) leads to
lost packages.The hard disk was crashed two days ago.
Wait patiently.–
eban
For the time being, you can download the required dll files at
http://121.78.227.9/ruby-dll/
Regards,
Park H.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Yugui (Yuki S.) [email protected]
wrote:
series has been used since 2003 and many great products were born on it.
SIZE: 9025004 bytes
- – Yugui (Yuki S.) [email protected]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.orgiEYEARECAAYFAkmDLZ4ACgkQOXzH5JLb/AWYWgCcC2PXYjaV2tCFrO+LFQoObhrM
UmIAn0EXvi2E6+aIa+9KCdhKSie+2tcL
=fAek
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi,
I’m a kind of confused. It seem as this is the first production
release (p0) and therefore it would be the latest Ruby stable
distribution; but the download page at www.ruby-lang.org still shows
1.8.7-p72 as the stable and recommended one.
Do I need to wait for a final production release (somethin new for me)
or it is www.ruby-lang.org update issue.
Thanks,
Ubaldo
I want to thank all ruby team for this great work.
If i can say it, i’d like to have an installer for windows as it was for
the old 1.8.6
On Feb 9, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Ubaldo V. wrote:
It seem as this is the first production
release (p0) and therefore it would be the latest Ruby stable
distribution; but the download page at www.ruby-lang.org still shows
1.8.7-p72 as the stable and recommended one.
Sorry. I have updated the link now.
James Edward G. II
Hello. Everyone!
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.
Sponsor our Newsletter | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs