Ruby

I agree with the fact that the question wasn’t that
precise, but i got my answer, so case closed.

I don’t think you got your answer because if you would
you would have learned something.

The proper answer to your fake question ‘completely change
my vision about Ruby programming language’ is elegance.

This is the single reason that trumps all the other reasons
given. It is something that most other programming languages
will not often have.

If you don’t understand what elegance means then have
fun coding in javascript, I am sure you will write the
next node.js in it (lol) - sarbull (Cezar Sîrbu) · GitHub
but you are already a php expert so why don’t you stay
in that awesome language?
simplify/lib at master · sarbull/simplify · GitHub

Note that “everything (with few exceptions) is an object in
Ruby.” is a cop-out that is useless. It is simply a model
for how to handle complexity. But given your complexity in
PHP, I dare claim that ruby can do everything much better
than PHP.

Wanna put up and write frameworks from scratch to compare?
All libraries used in these must be written from zero of
course - anyone found copy/pasting automatically loses.

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Stu [email protected] wrote:

I can’t say for sure though it may be optional to consider how one may
deal with exploring new dialects coming from an inferior closed minded view
of STFU and GTFO opinionated implementation of HHOK to their own mis-guided
attempt to explore the domain problem… maybe this will help you for the
next question : How To Ask Questions The Smart Way unless
the next question has no real value which one may derive any facts to
produce without error an actual determinate response.

I think we should just stop now.

Although the ESR page is a classic and a must-read.