David K. wrote in post #970755:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Paul B.
[email protected]wrote:
Assuming you mean now and not not above, I think your analogy is
reasonable
I mean don’t run bundle install and all seems to be fine.
David K. wrote in post #970755:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Paul B.
[email protected]wrote:
Assuming you mean now and not not above, I think your analogy is
reasonable
I mean don’t run bundle install and all seems to be fine.
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Paul B.
[email protected]wrote:
Really?! Well, whatever works I’ve got my own set of rails voodoo too
David K. wrote in post #970784:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Paul B.
[email protected]wrote:Really?! Well, whatever works I’ve got my own set of rails voodoo too
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Paul B.
[email protected]wrote:
gem ‘will_paginate’, :git =>
‘git://github.com/mislav/will_paginate.git’,
:branch => ‘rails3’You where more right than I thought. But you only have to add:
gem ‘will_paginate’
Not running bundle install will then be the same as ‘require’. I think.
Assuming you mean now and not not above, I think your analogy is
reasonable
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.
Sponsor our Newsletter | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs