dubstep
1
Hi all,
i found out today that if one will assign string to a variable like
this:
a = “08800123”
and then want to have a substring like this:
a[2]
the result is:
=> 56
it gets even better:
#a[2,1]
=> “8”
i would expect same result from both.
Also a[2] is not what specification says about String class.
Should i file a bug?
Best greetings,
Paweł Wielgus.
2011/9/26 Paweł Wielgus [email protected]
=> “8”
i would expect same result from both.
Also a[2] is not what specification says about String class.
Should i file a bug?
No, it is not a bug. It is the behavior in Ruby 1.8, which was changed
in
1.9
Try the --1.9 flag
ayosec@rubies [jruby-1.6.4] ~$ jruby -S irb
jruby-1.6.4 :001 > “08800123”[2]
=> 56
jruby-1.6.4 :002 > “08800123”[2, 1]
=> “8”
ayosec@rubies [jruby-1.6.4] ~$ jruby --1.9 -S irb
jruby-1.6.4 :001 > “08800123”[2]
=> “8”
jruby-1.6.4 :002 > “08800123”[2, 1]
=> “8”
jruby-1.6.4 :003 >
This is not a bug but the difference between Ruby 1.8.7 semantics and
Ruby 1.9.2 semantics. I suspect you are looking at Ruby 1.9
documentation.
-Tom
1.9.2 ~/work/Purugin master 650% ruby -e ‘a = “08800123”; p a[2],
a[2,1]’
“8”
“8”
1.9.2 ~/work/Purugin master 651% rvm use 1.8.7
Using /Users/enebo/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.8.7-p334
1.8.7 ~/work/Purugin master 652% ruby -e ‘a = “08800123”; p a[2],
a[2,1]’
56
“8”
1.8.7 ~/work/Purugin master 653% jruby -e ‘a = “08800123”; p a[2],
a[2,1]’
56
“8”
1.8.7 ~/work/Purugin master 654% jruby --1.9 -e ‘a = “08800123”; p a[2],
a[2,1]’
“8”
“8”
2011/9/26 Pawe W. [email protected]:
=> “8”
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
–
blog: http://blog.enebo.com twitter: tom_enebo
mail: [email protected]
Hi Ayose and Thomas,
of course i was looking at 1.9 specs
that’s how googling “ruby string” ends up,
i wasn’t aware of this up until now.
Shame on me and sorry for your wasted time.
Best greetings,
Pawe W…
2011/9/26 Thomas E Enebo [email protected]: