Hi everyone
I want to make a custom exception like so:
class BillRowError < StandardError
def initialize(field, index)
@field = field
@index = index
end
end
I’ll call this like so:
raise(BillRowError.new(:roamingcalls, @index), “Roaming Calls field
missing”) if n.length == 0
But now I’d like to be able to modify the string that Ruby prints when
the
exception is not rescue’d. I thought I could add this method to the
BillRowError class:
def message
@message + " field: #{@field}, row: #{@index}"
end
That almost works but I get a “instance variable @message not
initialized”
warning, which means Ruby is not setting @message in my object like I
expected. Making my own message= method doesn’t help.
Can an exception object access and modify the message that gets passed
in
the “raise”?
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Leslie V.
[email protected]wrote:
end
That almost works but I get a “instance variable @message not initialized”
warning, which means Ruby is not setting @message in my object like I
expected. Making my own message= method doesn’t help.
Can an exception object access and modify the message that gets passed in
the “raise”?
You could try rewriting the to_s method and take advantage of the
inheritance:
def to_s
super + " field: #{@field}, row: #{@index}"
end
That worked for me. I’m not sure if this is the recommended solution.
Judging by the C source, Exception uses hidden(*) instance variables
“mesg” and “bt” for message and backtrace respectively. However, the
accessor #message internally calls #to_s, which you can override.
class BillRowError < StandardError
def initialize(field, index)
@field = field
@index = index
end
alias :orig_to_s :to_s
def to_s
“#{orig_to_s} field: #{@field}, row: #{@index}”
end
end
begin
raise BillRowError.new(5, 7), “bar”
rescue BillRowError => e
p e
p e.instance_variables
p e.message
p e.backtrace
end
Produces:
#<BillRowError: bar field: 5, row: 7>
["@index", “@field”]
“bar field: 5, row: 7”
[“ert.rb:14”]
Admittedly this behaviour doesn’t seem to be well documented, so may be
fragile. Use at your own risk.
HTH,
Brian.
(*) It uses instance variables whose names don’t begin with ‘@’ and so
cannot be accessed by normal code
On Apr 6, 10:44 am, Leslie V. [email protected] wrote:
end
def message
@message + " field: #{@field}, row: #{@index}"
end
That almost works but I get a “instance variable @message not initialized”
warning, which means Ruby is not setting @message in my object like I
expected. Making my own message= method doesn’t help.
Can an exception object access and modify the message that gets passed in
the “raise”?
The default Exception:initialize is defined to take 1 parameter, a
string containing the error message
You define different initialize parameters so @message is not getting
set as expected
Maybe something like:
class BillRowError < StandardError
def initialize(msg, field, index)
super(msg)
@field = field
@index = index
end
def message
@message + " field: #{@field}, row: #{@index}"
end
end
…
raise(BillRowError.new(“Roaming Calls field missing”,:roamingcalls,
@index), ) if n.length == 0
cheers
Chris H. wrote:
The default Exception:initialize is defined to take 1 parameter, a
string containing the error message
But ‘raise’ also lets you pass an error message, in addition to the
exception instance.
Note that even the default constructor doesn’t create an instance
variable called @message.
class Foo < StandardError
end
begin
raise Foo, “bar”
rescue Foo => e
p e
p e.instance_variables
p e.instance_variable_get(:@message)
p e.message
p e.backtrace
end
#<Foo: bar>
[] # << No instance variables!
nil # << No @message!
“bar”
[“ert.rb:5”]
On Apr 6, 11:56 am, Brian C. [email protected] wrote:
class Foo < StandardError
end
#<Foo: bar>
[] # << No instance variables!
nil # << No @message!
“bar”
[“ert.rb:5”]
Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
I should stop answering questions based on reading the docs at ruby-
docs.org, they are just not very clear…plus sloppy reading on my
part doesn’t help 
So message is not an attribute so using @message is wrong.
It looks like overriding to_s, or maybe using super in the override of
message to get the parents input.
cheers
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Chris H. [email protected]
wrote:
I should stop answering questions based on reading the docs at ruby-
docs.org, they are just not very clear…plus sloppy reading on my
part doesn’t help
So message is not an attribute so using @message is wrong.
It looks like overriding to_s, or maybe using super in the override of
message to get the parents input.
Yip, these surprising revelations were the reason for my post!
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Brian C. [email protected]
wrote:
alias :orig_to_s :to_s
p e.message
Admittedly this behaviour doesn’t seem to be well documented, so may be
fragile. Use at your own risk.
Wow thanks for this, I didn’t think of aliasing the old to_s. I find it
strange that exceptions don’t just use a plain old @message instance
variable but I suppose there’s some good reason for it.