rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On Nov 24, 2011, at 12:48 AM, Anran Yang wrote:
should be_structured_as( :can_be_a => { :parallel_programming_model, :description } }})end
end===========================================
The purpose is to test the entire model structure(attributes, inheritance and
association).
Then term Behavior Driven Development came into being, in part, to
discourage this approach to testing. We believe testing should be about
behavior, and that testing structures leads to highly coupled tests that
are hard to change.
I’d recommend thinking about the need for each of these attributes, come
up with examples of how they are used and write those instead. That
said, see below for more on how matchers work.
obj = Factory.create(klass)end
end===============================================
To simplify the matcher definition, I used some other machers like “obj.should
have_these_attributes (desc[:has] ||= [])”, this works fine, thanks to the
excellent new matcher dsl syntax. Howerver, I got trouble when running the test
using “rspec spec/models/hpgc_spec.rb -fd”. The test passed but print<Screenshot.png>
instead of something like “Hpgc should be structured as …”. I think it may due
to the other matcher I used because the message is from the matcher
“have_these_attributes”.
That’s correct. The default behavior is that the block passed to the
“match” method in the matcher DSL is expected to return a boolean. If it
raises an exception instead, that exception bubbles up and becomes the
source of the failure message.
I try to add method “description” but seems it doesn’t work.
“description” is used for the documentation formatter, not for failure
messages. If you run “rspec spec --format documentation” you’ll see
names for all your examples.
And the failure message is also a problem. I search the web and come across some
solutions, but all of them need manually build the message. I’ve not come out a
clean way to do this(I must add some invasive clauses to track the error) and
think maybe the best behaviour would be that it “throw” the failure message of
inner matchers or false-value expressions. But this time it just told me something
like “Hpgc is expected to be structured as …”.
Instead of using the “match” method in the matcher, you can use
“match_unless_raises”, which returns false if it captures an exception,
letting the matcher control the failure message (which is what I think
you’re looking for):
RSpec::Matchers.define :be_structured_as do |structure|
def check(namespace, klass, desc)
# …
end
match_unless_raises do |namespace|
self.class.send :include, namespace
structure.each { |key, value| check namespace, key, value }
end
end
HTH,
David