Error building ruby p290

I get the following build error on my Linux box while trying to build
ruby-1.9.2-p290, how to fix? it look like a issues with RDoc

make[1]: Entering directory /opt/ruby-1.9.2-p290' gcc -O3 -ggdb -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-parentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-long-long -L. -rdynamic -Wl,-export-dynamic main.o -Wl,-R -Wl,/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -lruby-static -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lcrypt -lm -o ruby make[1]: Leaving directory /opt/ruby-1.9.2-p290’
Generating RDoc documentation
./miniruby -I./lib -I.ext/common -I./- -r./ext/purelib.rb
./tool/runruby.rb --extout=.ext – “./bin/rdoc” --no-force-update
–all --ri --op “.ext/rdoc” “.”
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rdoc-3.8/lib/rdoc/rdoc.rb:79:
warning: already initialized constant GENERATORS
uh-oh! RDoc had a problem:
undefined method `coverage_report’ for #RDoc::Options:0x00000001966e68

run with --debug for full backtrace
make: *** [rdoc] Error 1
root@six9:/opt/ruby-1.9.2-p290#


Kind Regards,
Rajinder Y. | DevMentor.org | Do Good! ~ Share Freely

GNU/Linux: 2.6.35-22-generic
Kubuntu x86_64 10.10 | KDE 4.5.1
Ruby 1.9.2p0 | Rails 3.0.1

i currently have ruby 1.9.2p136 install with rdoc 3.8

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Dev G. [email protected] wrote:

Generating RDoc documentation
root@six9:/opt/ruby-1.9.2-p290#


Kind Regards,
Rajinder Y. | DevMentor.org | Do Good! ~ Share Freely

GNU/Linux: 2.6.35-22-generic
Kubuntu x86_64 10.10 | KDE 4.5.1
Ruby 1.9.2p0 | Rails 3.0.1


Kind Regards,
Rajinder Y. | DevMentor.org | Do Good! ~ Share Freely

GNU/Linux: 2.6.35-22-generic
Kubuntu x86_64 10.10 | KDE 4.5.1
Ruby 1.9.2p0 | Rails 3.0.1

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Dev G. [email protected] wrote:

-Wl,/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -lruby-static -lpthread -lrt -ldl

run with --debug for full backtrace
make: *** [rdoc] Error 1
root@six9:/opt/ruby-1.9.2-p290#

Obviously the wrong rdoc is invoked. Strange, this did not happen to
me. Maybe someone who knows the build process can comment. In the
meantime can you post your environment?

Kind regards

robert

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Robert K.
[email protected] wrote:

-Wno-long-long -L. -rdynamic -Wl,-export-dynamic main.o -Wl,-R
undefined method `coverage_report’ for #RDoc::Options:0x00000001966e68

robert


remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/

my evn: i have rdoc 3.8 installed, still getting build error?

$ uname -a
Linux six9 2.6.35-30-generic #54-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 7 18:41:54 UTC
2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux

$ gem -v
1.8.5

$ ruby -v
ruby 1.9.2p136 (2010-12-25 revision 30365) [x86_64-linux]

On Jul 20, 2011, at 8:29 AM, Dev G. wrote:

I get the following build error on my Linux box while trying to build
ruby-1.9.2-p290, how to fix? it look like a issues with RDoc

[]

Can you run just this from the build directory:

./miniruby -I./lib -I.ext/common -I./- -r./ext/purelib.rb
./tool/runruby.rb --extout=.ext – “./bin/rdoc” --no-force-update
–all --ri --op “.ext/rdoc” “.” --debug

It should print out a backtrace

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Eric H. [email protected]
wrote:

./tool/runruby.rb --extout=.ext – “./bin/rdoc” --no-force-update
–all --ri --op “.ext/rdoc” “.” --debug

It should print out a backtrace

i assume that’s all in one line? here is what I got

/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rdoc-3.8/lib/rdoc/rdoc.rb:79:
warning: already initialized constant GENERATORS
undefined method coverage_report' for #<RDoc::Options:0x000000027cd678> /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rdoc-3.8/lib/rdoc/rdoc.rb:428:in document’
./bin/rdoc:15:in `’

On Jul 20, 2011, at 6:28 PM, Dev G. wrote:

It should print out a backtrace

i assume that’s all in one line?

Yup.

here is what I got

/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rdoc-3.8/lib/rdoc/rdoc.rb:79:
warning: already initialized constant GENERATORS
undefined method coverage_report' for #<RDoc::Options:0x000000027cd678> /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rdoc-3.8/lib/rdoc/rdoc.rb:428:indocument’
./bin/rdoc:15:in `’

I tried to reproduce your issue with the following steps:

Download 1.9.2-p136 and -p290

Install p136 into ~/tmp/ruby/136

export PATH=~/tmp/ruby/136/bin

Install RDoc 3.8

in p290: ./configure --prefix=/Users/drbrain/tmp/ruby/290; make

It did not reproduce.

Do you have RUBYOPT set?

Do you have any rdoc plugins installed? gem list rdoc should list
them

Can you run this command:

$ ./miniruby -I./lib -I.ext/common -I./- -r./ext/purelib.rb
./tool/runruby.rb --extout=.ext – -e ‘require “rdoc/rdoc”; p
$".grep(/generator/)’

I get:

["/Users/drbrain/tmp/ruby/ruby-1.9.2-p290/lib/rdoc/generator.rb",
“/Users/drbrain/tmp/ruby/ruby-1.9.2-p290/lib/rdoc/generator/markup.rb”,
“/Users/drbrain/tmp/ruby/ruby-1.9.2-p290/lib/rdoc/generator/darkfish.rb”,
“/Users/drbrain/tmp/ruby/ruby-1.9.2-p290/lib/rdoc/generator/ri.rb”]

You should see something similar.

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Eric H. [email protected]
wrote:

–all --ri --op “.ext/rdoc” “.” --debug
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rdoc-3.8/lib/rdoc/rdoc.rb:79:

Do you have any rdoc plugins installed? gem list rdoc should list them

my output is (not sure why I got 1.9.1 in there???)

[“/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rdoc-3.8/lib/rdoc/generator.rb”,
“/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rdoc-3.8/lib/rdoc/generator/markup.rb”,
“/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rdoc-3.8/lib/rdoc/generator/darkfish.rb”,
“/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rdoc-3.8/lib/rdoc/generator/ri.rb”,
“/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/horo-1.0.3/lib/rdoc/generator/horo.rb”]

these are all my installed gems

*** LOCAL GEMS ***

abstract (1.0.0)
actionmailer (3.0.9, 3.0.4)
actionpack (3.0.9, 3.0.4)
activemodel (3.0.9, 3.0.4)
activerecord (3.0.9, 3.0.4)
activeresource (3.0.9, 3.0.4)
activesupport (3.0.9, 3.0.4)
archive-tar-minitar (0.5.2)
arel (2.1.3, 2.0.10, 2.0.9, 2.0.8)
authlogic (2.1.6)
autotest (4.4.6)
autotest-rails-pure (4.1.2)
babosa (0.2.2)
bcrypt-ruby (2.1.4)
builder (3.0.0, 2.1.2)
bundler (1.0.15, 1.0.10)
calendar_date_select (1.16.2)
cancan (1.5.1)
coffee-script (2.2.0)
coffee-script-source (1.1.1)
columnize (0.3.3)
daemon_controller (0.2.6)
devise (1.1.7)
diff-lcs (1.1.2)
erubis (2.7.0, 2.6.6)
execjs (1.2.0)
fastri (0.3.1.1)
fastthread (1.0.7)
file-tail (1.0.5)
forgery (0.3.7)
friendly_id (3.2.1)
grackle (0.1.10)
gruff (0.3.6)
hike (1.1.0)
horo (1.0.3)
i18n (0.6.0, 0.5.0)
json (1.5.3, 1.5.1)
linecache19 (0.5.12)
mail (2.3.0, 2.2.19, 2.2.15)
mechanize (1.0.0)
memcache-client (1.8.5)
mime-types (1.16)
minitest (1.6.0 ruby)
mocha (0.9.12)
multi_json (1.0.3)
nifty-generators (0.4.5)
nokogiri (1.4.6, 1.4.4)
oauth (0.4.4)
paperclip (2.3.8)
passenger (3.0.2)
patron (0.4.11)
pg (0.10.1)
polyglot (0.3.1)
rack (1.3.0, 1.2.2, 1.2.1)
rack-cache (1.0.2)
rack-mount (0.8.1, 0.6.14, 0.6.13)
rack-ssl (1.3.2)
rack-test (0.6.0, 0.5.7)
rails (3.0.9, 3.0.4)
railties (3.0.9, 3.0.4)
rake (0.9.2, 0.8.7 ruby)
rdoc (3.8, 2.5.8)
RedCloth (4.2.7)
rmagick (2.13.1)
rspec (2.5.0)
rspec-core (2.5.1)
rspec-expectations (2.5.0)
rspec-mocks (2.5.0)
rspec-rails (2.5.0)
ruby-debug-base19 (0.11.25)
ruby-debug19 (0.11.6)
ruby-prof (0.10.7)
ruby_core_source (0.1.5)
sass (3.1.3)
simple_form (1.3.1)
sprockets (2.0.0.beta.10)
spruz (0.2.5)
sqlite3 (1.3.3)
thor (0.14.6)
tilt (1.3.2)
tiny_mce (0.1.4)
tkri (0.9.5)
treetop (1.4.9)
tzinfo (0.3.29, 0.3.25, 0.3.24)
uglifier (1.0.0)
w3c_validators (1.1.1)
warden (1.0.3)
webrat (0.7.3)
will_paginate (2.3.15)
wxruby (2.0.0 x86_64-linux)
yajl-ruby (0.8.2)
ZenTest (4.4.2)


Kind Regards,
Rajinder Y. | DevMentor.org | Do Good! ~ Share Freely

GNU/Linux: 2.6.35-22-generic
Kubuntu x86_64 10.10 | KDE 4.5.1
Ruby 1.9.2p0 | Rails 3.0.1

On Jul 21, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Dev G. wrote:

my output is (not sure why I got 1.9.1 in there???)

1.9.1 is the API compatibility version. 1.9.1 is expected.

[“/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rdoc-3.8/lib/rdoc/generator.rb”,
“/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rdoc-3.8/lib/rdoc/generator/markup.rb”,
“/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rdoc-3.8/lib/rdoc/generator/darkfish.rb”,
“/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rdoc-3.8/lib/rdoc/generator/ri.rb”,
“/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/horo-1.0.3/lib/rdoc/generator/horo.rb”]

You can work around this by uninstalling horo or RDoc 3.8 and
reinstalling after completing the upgrade to 1.9.2-p290.

I’m not sure how to fix the actual issue in an easy way.

The problem is this:

RDoc 2.5.8 comes with Ruby 1.9.2

RDoc 2.5.8 will try to load plugins when rdoc/rdoc is loaded.

The plugin horo activates the RDoc gem, then requires rdoc/rdoc again
redefining methods that won’t work with the objects created before the
plugin load.

Could you add a ticket to redmine.ruby-lang.org and assign it to me?

It should say “RDoc should not load plugins when building ri data”

On 11-07-21 09:24 PM, Dev G. wrote:

./miniruby -I./lib -I.ext/common -I./- -r./ext/purelib.rb ./tool/runruby.rb
–extout=.ext – -e ‘require “rdoc/rdoc”; p $".grep(/generator/)’

btw I am seeing the exact same issue on my other Linux box

$uname -a
Linux karma 2.6.38-10-generic #46-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 28 15:07:17 UTC
2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

$ruby -v
ruby 1.9.2p180 (2011-02-18 revision 30909) [x86_64-linux]

$gem -v
1.3.7

$ ./miniruby -I./lib -I.ext/common -I./- -r./ext/purelib.rb
./tool/runruby.rb --extout=.ext – -e ‘require “rdoc/rdoc”; p
$".grep(/generator/)’

/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rdoc-3.8/lib/rdoc/rdoc.rb:79:
warning: already initialized constant GENERATORS
["/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rdoc-3.8/lib/rdoc/generator.rb",
“/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rdoc-3.8/lib/rdoc/generator/markup.rb”,
“/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rdoc-3.8/lib/rdoc/generator/darkfish.rb”,
“/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rdoc-3.8/lib/rdoc/generator/ri.rb”,
“/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/horo-1.0.3/lib/rdoc/generator/horo.rb”]

Don’t forget to add a ticket so that other pure souls are not running
into this as well :slight_smile:

On 11-07-21 11:00 PM, Eric H. wrote:

Could you add a ticket to redmine.ruby-lang.org and assign it to me?

It should say “RDoc should not load plugins when building ri data”
workaround fixed my issue. i’ve opened a new ticke and assigned it too
you, thanks for your help!

…now I got an issue with rails…don’t think it’s related to this!