Sorry if I mentioned this one before, but has anyone proposed being able
to do something like
"it should be able".to {
}
? (or something like that)…
Might be preferable where a test description doesn’t start with “it”
Thoughts?
Thanks.
-r
On Dec 20, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Roger P. wrote:
Might be preferable where a test description doesn’t start with “it”
I think ending in “to” is just as constraining as starting with “it”,
no?
Thoughts?
“it” and “specify” are both aliases for “example”, so you can say:
describe “foo” do
example “doing something or other” do
…
end
end
HTH,
David
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:02 PM, David C. [email protected]
wrote:
Probably one could argue that in a spec environment what I am about to
say does not apply as much as in production code. Yet I feel that it
is not the responsibility of a String to describe an example.
This theoretical observation apart, I find the idea rather appealing.
Anyway I am not qualified to vote or judge, just wanted to share these
thoughts.
Cheers
Robert
–
The 1,000,000th fibonacci number contains ‘42’ 2039 times; that is
almost 30 occurrences more than expected (208988 digits).
N.B. The 42nd fibonacci number does not contain ‘1000000’ that is
almost the expected 3.0e-06 times.