Scott,
Are there any plans to update the models from has_and_belongs_to_many
with
has_many through?
(perhaps we could assist in the effort)
Linda D.
Innovative Solutions Inc.
Essex, Maryland USA
(443) 506 9106
Scott,
Are there any plans to update the models from has_and_belongs_to_many
with
has_many through?
(perhaps we could assist in the effort)
Linda D.
Innovative Solutions Inc.
Essex, Maryland USA
(443) 506 9106
We haven’t looked at it yet. It’s not a high priority, because the
current code works well enough, and I don’t really expect to see habtm
disappear in the near future, no matter how little the Rails core
likes it.
Is there actually an advantage to converting existing code?
Scott
Scott,
I ran into the same issue as reported here:
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4386
When I asked Mark (he is the one who submitted the ticket) he replied
with
this (which makes a whole lot of sense to me)
-Linda
“Scott L.” [email protected] writes:
We haven’t looked at it yet. It’s not a high priority, because the
current code works well enough, and I don’t really expect to see habtm
disappear in the near future, no matter how little the Rails core
likes it.
It is one of those things I’m thinking of, not particularly vigorously
yet, but it’s definitely on my todo eventually list.
Is there actually an advantage to converting existing code?
Cleanliness.
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.
Sponsor our Newsletter | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs