"have" matcher special case for owned collection with 1 item

Testing RSpec
1

If I’m reading the docs right, the current implementation would be:
my_workspace.should have(1).documents

Would it be hard to have it be: my_workspace.should have(1).document
^
(no
s)
Sean DeNigris
[email protected]

2

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:57 PM, DeNigris S. [email protected]
wrote:

If I’m reading the docs right, the current implementation would be: my_workspace.should have(1).documents

Would it be hard to have it be: my_workspace.should have(1).document
^
(no s)

Should be pretty simple. Why don’t you file a feature request at
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com? If you submit a patch w/ specs it’ll
likely get in sooner than later.