After stumbling across the post below, i was playing around with it, but
noticed if there was ever a bug in the app, the whole domain would
freeze up. Is there anyone else using this out there? I just tried
emailing him…we’ll see if support is still around…
Paul B. paul at paulbutcher.com
Wed Sep 20 06:18:53 EDT 2006
* Previous message: [Mongrel] [Slightly OT] Uploading files with
firefox
* Next message: [Mongrel] Why Rails + mongrel_cluster + load
balancing doesn’t work for us and the beginning of a solution
* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
We have been searching for a Rails deployment architecture which works
for
us for some time. We’ve recently moved from Apache 1.3 + FastCGI to
Apache
2.2 + mod_proxy_balancer + mongrel_cluster, and it’s a significant
improvement. But it still exhibits serious performance problems.
We have the beginnings of a fix that we would like to share.
To illustrate the problem, imagine a 2 element mongrel cluster running a
Rails app containing the following simple controller:
class HomeController < ApplicationController
def fast
sleep 1
render :text => “I’m fast”
end
def slow
sleep 10
render :text => "I'm slow"
end
end
and the following test app
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
require File.dirname(FILE) + ‘/config/boot’
require File.dirname(FILE) + ‘/config/environment’
end_time = 1.minute.from_now
fast_count = 0
slow_count = 0
fastthread = Thread.start do
while Time.now < end_time do
Net::HTTP.get ‘localhost’, ‘/home/fast’
fast_count += 1
end
end
slowthread = Thread.start do
while Time.now < end_time do
Net::HTTP.get ‘localhost’, ‘/home/slow’
slow_count += 1
end
end
fastthread.join
slowthread.join
puts “Fast: #{fast_count}”
puts “Slow: #{slow_count}”
In this scenario, there will be two requests outstanding at any time,
one
“fast” and one “slow”. You would expect approximately 60 fast and 6 slow
GETs to complete over the course of a minute. This is not what happens;
approximately 12 fast and 6 slow GETs complete per minute.
The reason is that mod_proxy_balancer assumes that it can send multiple
requests to each mongrel and fast requests end up waiting for slow
requests,
even if there is an idle mongrel server available.
We’ve experimented with various different configurations for
mod_proxy_balancer without successfully solving this issue. As far as we
can
tell, all other popular load balancers (Pound, Pen, balance) behave in
roughly the same way.
This is causing us real problems. Our user interface is very
time-sensitive.
For common user actions, a page refresh delay of more than a couple of
seconds is unacceptable. What we’re finding is that if we have (say) a
reporting page which takes 10 seconds to display (an entirely acceptable
delay for a rarely-used report) then our users are seeing similar delays
on
pages which should be virtually instantaneous (and would be, if their
requests were directed to idle servers). Worse, we’re occasionally
seeing
unnecessary timeouts because requests are queuing up on one server.
The real solution to the problem would be to remove Rails’ inability to
handle more than one thread. In the absence of that solution, however,
we’ve
implemented (in Ruby) what might be the world’s smallest load-balancer.
It
only ever sends a single request to each member of the cluster at a
time.
It’s called HighWire and is available on RubyForge (no Gem yet - it’s on
the
list of things to do!):
svn checkout svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/highwire
Using this instead of mod_proxy_balancer, and running the same test
script
above, we see approximately 54 fast and 6 slow requests per minute.
HighWire is very young and has a way to go. It’s not had any serious
optimization or testing, and there are a bunch of things that need doing
before it can really be considered production ready. But it does work
for
us, and does produce a significant performance improvement.
Please check it out and let us know what you think.
