I find myself doing the following quite a lot:
<% if user %><%= user.name %><% else %>Anonymous<% end %>
I know that if I dont care about an else I can just do:
<%= user.name if user %>
Is there any simpler way to handle the else? This is a simple example
so it’s not really an issue… but for more complicated tests this gets
quite tedious.
On Apr 8, 2006, at 3:32 PM, The B. wrote:
quite tedious.
–
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/ .
Rails mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
You can use ternary conditionals.
<%= user ? user.name : “Anonymous” %>
Cheers-
-Ezra
Brilliant! I didn’t even think of that! I’ve been doing it for ages in
Java/JSP. Not sure why it didn’t occur to me.
Ezra Z. wrote:
You can use ternary conditionals.
<%= user ? user.name : “Anonymous” %>
The B. wrote:
Brilliant! I didn’t even think of that! I’ve been doing it for ages in
Java/JSP. Not sure why it didn’t occur to me.
Ezra Z. wrote:
You can use ternary conditionals.
<%= user ? user.name : “Anonymous” %>
<%= user.name||“Anonymous” %>
joey__ now j`ey on IRC
Hi –
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006, joey__ wrote:
The B. wrote:
Brilliant! I didn’t even think of that! I’ve been doing it for ages in
Java/JSP. Not sure why it didn’t occur to me.
Ezra Z. wrote:
You can use ternary conditionals.
<%= user ? user.name : “Anonymous” %>
<%= user.name||“Anonymous” %>
The problem with that is that if user is undefined or nil, it will
raise an error when it tries to call user.name.
David
–
David A. Black ([email protected] )
Ruby Power and Light, LLC (http://www.rubypowerandlight.com )
“Ruby for Rails” coming in PDF April 15, and in paper May 1!
NEWER EDITION AVAILABLE
The Well-Grounded Rubyist, Second Edition is now available. An eBook of the previous edition, The Well-Grounded Rubyist is included at no additional cost when you buy the revised edition!
Ruby for Rails helps Rails...