In Ruby on Rails, routes.rb, if we create a “named route”
map.something ":a/:b", :controller => 'foobar'
it will also create “something_path” and “something_url” which are two
methods usable in the controller and in the view. Does “map.connect”
create something like that too? Otherwise, isn’t “map.connect” somewhat
disadvantaged in this way? I checked that “connect_path” and
“connect_url” both aren’t created automatically.
On Jun 12, 12:11 pm, Jian L. [email protected] wrote:
In Ruby on Rails, routes.rb, if we create a “named route”
map.something ":a/:b", :controller => 'foobar'
it will also create “something_path” and “something_url” which are two
methods usable in the controller and in the view. Does “map.connect”
create something like that too? Otherwise, isn’t “map.connect” somewhat
disadvantaged in this way? I checked that “connect_path” and
“connect_url” both aren’t created automatically.
map.connect predates named routes.
Fred