±le 14.11.2007 08:28:59 -0600, Sean C. a dit :
| Peter,
|
| Are you using mongrel_cluster? If so, I would make sure you don’t run
| more than 2 mongrel processes. On an app I worked on this summer that
| was hosted on a 256 slice, we would have major problems if we ran more
| than two, our app would screech to a halt after about an hour of hitting
| various actions.
|
| FYI, seancribbs.com runs Radiant on a 256 slice with only one mongrel.
| I have yet to have a problem with it.
I’m wondering, do you have any performance benchmarks regarding the time
needed to serve a page and the number of mongrels ?
Are you using mongrel_cluster? If so, I would make sure you don’t run
more than 2 mongrel processes. On an app I worked on this summer that
was hosted on a 256 slice, we would have major problems if we ran more
than two, our app would screech to a halt after about an hour of hitting
various actions.
FYI, seancribbs.com runs Radiant on a 256 slice with only one mongrel.
I have yet to have a problem with it.
Cheers,
Sean
Thanks for the info on Slicehost + Mongrel performance. I’m slowly
moving all my Radiant apps over there and this is good knowledge to
have.
Are you using mongrel_cluster? If so, I would make sure you don’t run
more than 2 mongrel processes. On an app I worked on this summer that
was hosted on a 256 slice, we would have major problems if we ran more
than two, our app would screech to a halt after about an hour of hitting
various actions.
FYI, seancribbs.com runs Radiant on a 256 slice with only one mongrel.
I have yet to have a problem with it.
If you guys are concerned about performance, please search the mailing
list for Daniel’s most recent benchmarks. He’s done a great job making
sure Radiant’s cache performance is stellar.
Sean
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.