Hi all
I am puzzled about the rspec tests that are generated by Rails3
scaffolding. I am however not sure if this is the correct place to
discuss this issue.
It might be that a rails ML/chat is better suited for that kind of
discussion. It just depends on who is responsible for that code.
Somehow I am too stupid to find that out, so please bare with me if I
produced only noise here.
Cheers
Robert
–
The 1,000,000th fibonacci number contains ‘42’ 2039 times; that is
almost 30 occurrences more than expected (208988 digits).
N.B. The 42nd fibonacci number does not contain ‘1000000’ that is
almost the expected 3.0e-06 times.
On Nov 24, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Robert D. wrote:
Hi all
I am puzzled about the rspec tests that are generated by Rails3
scaffolding. I am however not sure if this is the correct place to
discuss this issue.
It might be that a rails ML/chat is better suited for that kind of
discussion. It just depends on who is responsible for that code.
Somehow I am too stupid to find that out, so please bare with me if I
produced only noise here.
When you run the scaffold generator, rspec-rails is responsible to
generate the specs. So this is the right place.
Cheers,
David
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:52 PM, David C. [email protected]
wrote:
produced only noise here.
When you run the scaffold generator, rspec-rails is responsible to generate the
specs. So this is the right place.
It is terrible how biased one can be, by learning it comes from you I
looked at the code with new confidence and pretty much seem to
understand it now.
Sorry for the noise and thank you
Cheers
Robert
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
–
The 1,000,000th fibonacci number contains ‘42’ 2039 times; that is
almost 30 occurrences more than expected (208988 digits).
N.B. The 42nd fibonacci number does not contain ‘1000000’ that is
almost the expected 3.0e-06 times.