I can’t believe I’m back again with another rest question. I did go
through
the peepcode podcast.
I thought though you can have multiple nested resources, is that not
true ?
I have this set up
map.resources :candidates do |candidate|
candidate.resources :canbackgrounds
candidate.resources :canpositions
end
I just coded up teh canpositions and now all of a sudden I’m getting a
no
method error on canbackgrounds. Wondering if I’m wrong about multiple
nests.
I just coded up teh canpositions and now all of a sudden I’m getting a no
method error on canbackgrounds. Wondering if I’m wrong about multiple
nests.
After juggling around the code a bit and testing various things it looks
like the above nested resources should be valid. However I’m getting
this
error:
Mysql::Error: #42S22Unknown column ‘canpositions.candidate_id’ in ‘where
clause’: SELECT count(*) AS count_all FROM canpositions WHERE (
canpositions.candidate_id = 12)
Agree… Imagine Ruby running much, much faster and closer to the
iron. It would run on IIS and possibly also on mono. This is not
about competing with Sun.
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:10:44 -0200
“Tim C.” [email protected] wrote:
John L. is one talented individual and a great voice of the ruby
community especially to the .NET and microsoft world. This is a good
thing for us.
I agree. Ruby on win32 sucks horribly. Mongrel runs incredibly slow.
Sockets throw weird errno exceptions. IO is painfully lacking.
If anyone can get a compatible Ruby 1.8 running on .NET it’d be a major
advantage for a huge number of people.
Also, I don’t think MS is all that interested in the J++ strategy
anymore. They only did that because they didn’t own the platform. With
.NET, they own the platform, and they can sell it better when more
languages run on it. Why else did they make it so easy to put other
languages on their gear?