hello,i am a linux system administrator ,and i have problem now,the
nginx as
picture server,the bandwidth
is higher than apache in the same condition.For example,established
connections is 3000,apache’s bandwidth is about 4MB,but the nginx is
about
7MB,i am sure the two servers run the same services,and in the same
datacenter .what should i do,maybe i should modify config files,but i
don’t
know what should i do.Could you help me,thanks!
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 03:28:05PM +0800, cq wei wrote:
hello,i am a linux system administrator ,and i have problem now,the nginx as
picture server,the bandwidth
is higher than apache in the same condition.For example,established
connections is 3000,apache’s bandwidth is about 4MB,but the nginx is about
7MB,i am sure the two servers run the same services,and in the same
datacenter .what should i do,maybe i should modify config files,but i don’t
know what should i do.Could you help me,thanks!
did you have things like mod_expire enabled on apache?
My god you are annoying. Wait for a reply like everybody else!
Hi cq wei,
On Don 14.08.2008 15:28, cq wei wrote:
hello,i am a linux system administrator ,and i have problem now,the
nginx as picture server,the bandwidth is higher than apache in the same
condition.For example,established connections is 3000,apache’s
bandwidth is about 4MB,but the nginx is about 7MB,i am sure the two
servers run the same services,and in the same datacenter .what should i
do,maybe i should modify config files,but i don’t know what should i
do.Could you help me,thanks!
Does you mean that with 3000 R/s you deliver 4MB with Apache and 7MB
with nginx?
Are you sure that the requests are the same, the data which are deliverd
and the r/s also?
BR
Aleks
I agree with you.
2008-08-14
Chancey
å‘件人: Tit P.
å‘é€æ—¶é—´ï¼š 2008-08-14 18:01:20
收件人: nginx
抄é€ï¼š
主题: Re: trouble
Also, look at gzip compression, you might want to have to turn that on
in nginx (in case you have it in apache).
I don’t see any other way to have such a big difference without
- difference with compression
- difference with request ammount
- difference with request caching, mod_expires (as mentioned before by
almir)
Lp
I am sure,others have asked me the same question.So,I think that the
problem
is in config file.
2008/8/14 Aleksandar L. [email protected]
Also, look at gzip compression, you might want to have to turn that on
in nginx (in case you have it in apache).
I don’t see any other way to have such a big difference without
- difference with compression
- difference with request ammount
- difference with request caching, mod_expires (as mentioned before by
almir)
Lp
Perhaps you could post the config file?
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 22:49:42, cq wei said…
I am sure,others have asked me the same question.So,I think that the
problem is in config file.
I really don’t see what difference the web server would make here.
You should do some research and compare individual requests, rather than
talking about vague large numbers, especially when you cannot guarantee
that
exactly the same requests were made to both servers. Right now, there
are
too many variables to know what’s really going on.
I use httpwatch to test a same image in apache and nginx.The result is
size
apache 457
nginx 699
I think that is where the question arises.
2008/8/15 iDEV d. o. o. [email protected]
Maybe apache handled only 4MBps of traffic and nginx can handle much
more?
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:06:38 +0800, “cq wei” [email protected]
wrote:
condition.For example,established connections is 3000,apache’s
Are you sure that the requests are the same, the data which are
Igor C. • POKE • 10 Redchurch Street • E2 7DD • +44 (0)20
7749 5355 •
www.pokelondon.com
–
iDEV, podjetje za spletne storitve, d.o.o.
Tomaž Marhat, CEO
Brda 15A
SI-2383 � martno pri Slovenj Gradcu
SLOVENIA - EU
Web: http://idev.si/
VAT #: SI43028195
Company ID #: 2346265
Mobile #: +386 70 819 789
I’m not sure if apache compresses images, but it is possible. And nginx
does not compresses content by default.
Maybe there’s the diffrence.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 09:56:06AM +0800, walt wrote:
I use httpwatch to test a same image in apache and nginx.The result is
size
apache 457
nginx 699
I think that is where the question arises.
What is this size ? Size of the image or size of image + HTTP header
size ?
What the size of the image itself ?
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 01:24:45PM +0800, walt wrote:
I am not very sure,the image is 27.88KB itself.
Then I do not understand what 457 and 699 mean.